From mdiehl at triton.unm.edu Tue Jul 13 17:51:48 1993 From: mdiehl at triton.unm.edu (J. Michael Diehl) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 17:51:48 PDT Subject: xor data hiding? In-Reply-To: <9307131439.AA46888@acs1.acs.ucalgary.ca> Message-ID: <9307140017.AA03238@triton.unm.edu> According to Douglas Sinclair: > > What you are talking about sounds like the original Vernam cipher that Dave > Kahn talks about in _CodeBreakers_. There, he was using a teletype with two > XORing tapes. One tape was 1000 characters long, the other was 999. Thus, > 999000 characters would have to go past before the system repeated. HOWEVER, > once it does repeat, all security is compromized. Even before that time, > I believe there are subtle attacks you can use based on the repetition of the > keys. So, this is not a secure cipher method. I would personally > suggest tacking an 128 bit IDEA key onto 4dos.com instead. Or use > DES even. The point wasn't to be unbreakably secure; it was to be UNFINDABLY secure. We convolute an allready encrypted message to the point of not being recognizable as cyphertext, then we hide it on the end of a file. We want it to look like garbage. > BTW: Though you could come up with a 30Kb+ string which when XORed would > give you any plaintext, you could not come up with a few small strings > which when used over each other would give you that. There just isn't enough > information to make that possible. Agreed. This leaves us with several OTP's laying around in zip format. This isn't so bad as long as we don't forget the original 7 keys. The main purpose of all of this is plausible deniability. Thanx for your comments. Still listening. +-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+ | J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY | | mdiehl at triton.unm.edu | But, I was mistaken. |available| | mike.diehl at fido.org | | Ask Me! | | (505) 299-2282 +-----------------------------+---------+ | | +------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+ | Politically Incorrect!" | +-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+ +----Is Big Brother in your phone? If you don't know, ask me---+