From mdavis at pro-sol.cts.com  Thu Jul  8 11:30:58 1993
From: mdavis at pro-sol.cts.com (Morgan Davis)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 93 11:30:58 PDT
Subject: I need a way to...
Message-ID: <g840230@pro-sol.cts.com>


nate at VIS.ColoState.EDU (CVL staff member Nate Sammons) writes:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
       [useful content deleted]
>
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| Nate Sammons   email: nate at VIS.ColoState.Edu
>|      Colorado State University Computer Visualization Laboratory
>|      Finger me at nate at monet.VIS.ColoState.Edu for my PGP key
>|  #include <std.disclaimer>
>|  "I have but one single desire - to tear down the sky" -A. Toomba
>+----------------------+
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.3
>
>iQCVAgUBLDxY0tTgi1fmrpxlAQH8ZgP7BHGGnAP2MGLg0pbhJ8HpgU/1t6Ai+ln5
>xzpcsvbG4cJwhKBrX5luVLGmdHSZxdZ3kyv4+G6ypcIb5MZMpiPzbGH7z2kuRc4y
>XlHBwrjOlbZDcyupJJUzSi8LuoQmXVu+M1r7EAkiK7JOMgljyOQ//E5ctJbt3qHl
>8eA0uJGQFqs=
>=4oo0
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


This is my first post here, so go easy if I'm way off base.  Why would
you want to include a PGP signature (in addition to your net .signature)
for a message that is NOT encoded?  I've included the pageful of useless
text from your message as an example of how wasteful this seems to me.
I'm all for personal privacy and message security, but this smacks of
either paranoia, showing off, or laziness.  Genuinely curious.

 /\/\  Morgan Davis Group (619/670-0563)
/ /__\  Internet: mdavis at pro-sol.cts.com