This page was mutated from its original content to reduce and change some links that could confuse integrity.
This was an html rendering of an original raw plaintext email numbered 005191.
WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
anonymous at extropia.wimsey.com
anonymous at extropia.wimsey.com
Fri Jul 16 12:28:19 PDT 1993
- Previous message: WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
- Next message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Clark Reynard asked:
Are there any fast, quick, reliable methods of forestalling phone
disconnection due to failure to pay the bills, and the ugly
reconnection fee which ensues thereupon?
I can't offer a method of *eliminating* your phone bill, but I have
been practicing a method of drastically *reducing* the charge for
local phone service.
Simply ask Pac Bell (In California) for "Lifeline" service. The
monthly bill is $1.31, after "credits" for "inside wire repair" and
"Tel Equip" (for buying your own phone(s)). Clark, do you think you
could afford that?
This gets you a local (outgoing) call allowance of 60 calls per month
(about 2 a day). Unlike regular measured service, which measures (and
charges) by call *and length of call*, each of your 60 calls under
lifeline can be of unlimited length. Back when I had a 2400 baud
modem, I frequently had single calls of 2-4 *hours* while uploading &
downloading files from various local BB's. Calls beyond your 60-call
allowance are charged at $.08 per call.
Of course, there's a catch. Lifeline service is only offered to
"poor" people. You have to sign a statement every year certifying
that your combined family income doesn't exceed their guidlines. But
although they warn you that the Public Utilities Commission "may
investigate" your claim; they apparently never do! Unlike the PG&E
lifeline program, Pac Bell doesn't ask for *any* documentation of your
income like W-2 forms or copies of your tax returns.
I've been on lifeline service for *years*, I think almost since they
started offering it, back when the Bell system was broken up, and
local phone rates were raised sharply. During most of that time, I
earned around $50,000/year. Now I'm retired & my pension is about
$24,000, still well above the lifeline "guideline".
One caveat, I live in an area of San Jose where many of my neighbors
are working-class, a few on welfare, etc. This scam might not work
from an address in Hillsboro, Los Gatos, or Saratoga; but who knows,
the PUC may be so incompetent and/or lazy that it might.
Considering the moral factors, if you *don't* claim lifeline
eligibility, then you are *charged* a few cents a month to pay for the
people who *do*! You are also charged $1.75 for "access to a long
distance carrier", even if you don't call long distance. (but
lifeline customers get an offsetting credit and still have long
distance access). So you have to choose to be a sheep or a wolf, a
victim or a victimizer, to either take unfair advantage of the system
or have it take unfair advantage of you; there is no middle ground.
Consider the pragmatic factors. Based on my experience, the chances of
getting "caught" seem remote. If I'm ever investigated, I plan to
play dumb and claim I didn't understand the lifeline forms I signed.
Since I didn't provide any false documentation of a low income (they
didn't *ask* for any), be pretty hard to prove intent to commit fraud.
So I expect the worst that could happen is that I'd have to pay some
estimate of what my correct bill might have been less what I actually
paid. I suspect there's a statute of limitations, which I've already
exceeded for most of the time I've been on lifeline. So this sounds
like a good bet. If you win, you win big; if you lose, you break
even, with chances of losing being much less than 50/50.
- Previous message: WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
- Next message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list