This page was mutated from its original content to reduce and change some links that could confuse integrity.
This was an html rendering of an original raw plaintext email numbered 005163.
The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
Paul Baclace
peb at PROCASE.COM
Thu Jul 15 11:29:13 PDT 1993
- Previous message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Next message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
>> typically a court order, to both key escrow authorities.
>"Typically", of course, means "not always", and it's coupled with the phrase
I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.
- Previous message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Next message: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list