From nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu Thu Jul 8 08:41:47 1993 From: nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu (nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 93 08:41:47 PDT Subject: Test. Sorry. Message-ID: <9307081541.AA12054@cicada.berkeley.edu> This is a test. Apologies for wasted bandwidth. AA01851; Thu, 8 Jul 93 11:40:10 EDT Received: by snark.shearson.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22568; Thu, 8 Jul 93 11:40:08 EDT Message-Id: <9307081540.AA22568 at snark.shearson.com> To: Rachel Beth Goldstein Cc: cypherpunks at toad.com Subject: Re: text p.d. cryptosystems for email In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jul 1993 11:03:02 EDT." <199307081503.AA28828 at panix.com> Reply-To: pmetzger at lehman.com X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1993 11:40:08 -0400 From: "Perry E. Metzger" Rachel Beth Goldstein says: > > this is probably a faq, but pardon me, since this is my first mail to > the cypherpunks list. the problem is this: i once worked for a > (nameless) finance company that had pseudo-wizard-dorkos for sa's, and > a gravitationally-challenged boss that routinely read employees' (ie. > *my*) personal email. i knew this because he asked me specific > questions regading the email subjects. both he and the dorkos > relished this ability and probably got some power trip from it. This is likely a violation of federal law, but never mind that. > however, friends told me that (1) crypt is easily compromised, and > (2) not all unix sites have crypt available anyway. are there > text-based alternates to crypt, such that i don't have to use > uuencode or btoa to mail encrypted text? What you want is PGP. Doubtless someone out there is likely to tell you more about it... Perry