This page was mutated from its original content to reduce and change some links that could confuse integrity.
This was an html rendering of an original raw plaintext email numbered 005218.
stegano codes.
Kragen Sittler
TO1SITTLER at APSICC.APS.EDU
Sun Jul 18 00:03:37 PDT 1993
- Previous message: Show Sunday on Clipper in Bay Area
- Next message: STEG: subliminal messages
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
In reference to a message by Mike Johnson:
I was thinking of steganography as being in two stages: first, you encrypt,
(possibly with the identity transformation) then, you embed your encrypted
message in your medium of transmission. My previous message was describing
requirements for a strong encryption algorithm, quite apart from the actual
embedding. I stand by my statements: the purpose of steganography is to make
it difficult or impossible for an interloper to determine that enciphered data
are being transferred. Thus, embedding a magic number in the file defeats the
purpose completely.
(As opposed to "slightly reducing security.")
I accept your correction regarding availability of software.
I think that designing a program to embed this apparently random bitstream in
an innocent-looking file is a different and much harder problem.
It is probable that I have misunderstood some part of your message, and I
apologize if this is the case.
Kragen
(Bug my sysman for a newsreader that allows quoting with >'s-his username is jim.)
- Previous message: Show Sunday on Clipper in Bay Area
- Next message: STEG: subliminal messages
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list