Anonymity Networks and Developer Determination

[coderman]

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 5:07 PM, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> This email is shared from a place of forthrightness (and hope).
>
> https://github.com/ipfs/notes/issues/37>
> Just to add, I suspect the reason that the state of public anonymity tools is not stronger is that the existing international powerholders, whose power could be reduced by widespread accessible anonymity, take diverse action to slow the release and hinder the effective use of the research.

... see also:
"""
Dear [@seanlynch](https://github.com/ipfs/notes/issues/37#issuecomment-687661383

:P~

TL;DR: for the IPFS Tor support issue:

IPFS wants a security audit before merging Tor support. Tor support was volunteer effort - no paid security review possible. Thus - IPFS does not support Tor :/

best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3298 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20200905/9d1997c1/attachment.txt>