From cdodhner at indirect.com  Thu Jul 15 13:11:16 1993
From: cdodhner at indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 13:11:16 PDT
Subject: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
In-Reply-To: <9307151828.AA08970@banff.procase.com>
Message-ID: <9307152009.AA15744@indirect.com>


> I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
> which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
> is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.

Of course, anything, such as a certain DEC machine, could be construed as
a threat to national security...

Wouldn't want any 'foreign nationals' getting their hands on a computer,
would we...<G>